From MAAMOUN@aucegypt.edu Sun Jun 09 02:12:10 2002
Return-Path:
X-Sender: maamoun@aucegypt.edu
X-Apparently-To: egyptphotography@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 9 Jun 2002 09:12:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 44256 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2002 09:12:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
by m1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Jun 2002 09:12:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO tom.aucegypt.edu) (208.159.7.5)
by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Jun 2002 09:12:09 -0000
Received: from [172.16.57.46] by auc.AUCEGYPT.EDU (PMDF V6.1-1 #40427)
with ESMTP id <01KIQ5SSNV3A8Y5DK5@auc.AUCEGYPT.EDU> for
egyptphotography@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 09 Jun 2002 12:11:50 +0200 (EET)
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 12:15:57 +0300
Subject: The list
To: egyptphotography@yahoogroups.com
Message-id:
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022
From: Maha Maamoun
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=36327594
X-Yahoo-Profile: mahamaamoun
The List:
1. Ahmed Hosni
2. Sherif Tamim
3. Rana el-Nemr
4. Maha Maamoun
hi sherif,
i have to say a couple of things too:
1. if your negative looks too dense (compare with previous negs) then thats
the obvious cause of the grain. you either over-exposed or over-developed.
check the edge of the negative (where you have the frame numbers writtten).
this part is not exposed during photographing and so is usually
clear/transparent, and the frame numbers are dark and stand out (even if
film is overexposed). if the film was exposed to light during developing or
was over-developed, this bit would get darker and would be closer in tone
the image frames themselves.
2. the thing with C-41 negs is that if you're printing yourself they take so
much longer exposure times - minutes. and so imagine if you're burning in
some areas. also i suspect they might be grainier, though not sure.
i think meeting that developing/printing expert rana mentioned would be very
informative.
take care,
maha