Dear Friends,
I think that Mr Arafat is a controversial character. People look back
at history and analyse his deeds. They are likely to come out with
different opinions. I think that Arafat had some skills which none
of the Arab leaders have. He was the person who could deal with what
so called progressive regimes and reactionary regimes. In simple
words Arafat used to deal with Arab leaders who have different
ambitions, different agendas and different ideologies. Could any one
imagine himself/ herself dealing or even talking to twenty-two gods
and ask them for support (money and weapons? Just think about their
demands or their fantastic ideas, which would enable the Palestinians
to liberate Palestine. As we know Arab leaders are above criticism
and no one can question their credibility and their holly ambitions
to liberate Palestine. So I would like to apologise and ask for
forgiveness before people can accuse me of blasphemy. Having said
that I think that helpless Arab individuals know that their oil is
being sold to our liberators who sponsor peaceful crusades to conquer
(Sorry to democratise) Islamic countries.
To those who criticised Arafat, I would like to say that compared
with their majesties, the kings and the presidents of Arab states,
Arafat was the least corrupt leader, he did not give up his people's
right to return to their homeland and resisted all pressure to give
up Jerusalem as well. On the other hand, the oil rich heads of
Islamic states gave up their own people, sponsor crusades to invade
Afghanistan and Iraq and they are ready for more sacrifices including
giving up Jihad and probably members of their holly family for the
crusaders to look after them. Arabs have a saying, which says, "when
the bull falls down, there will be many knives" So dear friends, it
is your right to express your view of Arafat but with your generosity
and with your creative imagination, don't forget George Orwell pigs.
They deserve to be slaughtered with you knives.
Mabrouk M Masaud